The real test of an AI agent starts after the demo
A fluent plan is the easy part to demonstrate. Authority, retries and recovery determine whether an agent can be trusted with ordinary work.
9 min readCircuit Atlas follows AI, robotics and the infrastructure behind useful technology. We look beyond demonstrations to operating conditions, evidence and failure. Our focus is what a system does, under whose authority, at what cost and with what limits.
A fluent plan is the easy part to demonstrate. Authority, retries and recovery determine whether an agent can be trusted with ordinary work.
9 min readA high score is useful evidence about a defined test. An operational evaluation also has to count refusals, handovers, repeated runs and the state left behind.
9 min readA machine that moves supplies through a building can reveal more about useful automation than a spectacular humanoid demonstration. Its hardest problems may belong to the building and the service around it.
8 min readBuying accelerators, connecting a building and running a useful AI service happen on different schedules. Confusing power, energy and timing makes the infrastructure argument harder to solve.
9 min readAn imagined purchasing memo promises control, privacy and zero cost from one model download. Reading its claims separately produces a more realistic deployment decision.
9 min readA search result can be relevant, readable and obsolete. Follow a fictional support answer from the document library to the final citation to see where grounding can fail.
9 min readThe evidence has changed, but not into a universal replacement percentage. Reading the chronology reveals why tool version, task selection and the definition of output matter.
9 min readLocal inference can keep a request off a server. A useful privacy claim also explains cloud fallback, surrounding app behavior and what happens to the answer afterwards.
9 min readA transcript's average error rate can conceal the one word that changes an instruction. Three ordinary viewing situations show why accessibility needs more than a language-model score.
10 min readA model can know the subject, recognize the question or have encountered the answer. A credible evaluation needs to distinguish those possibilities without treating every high score as evidence of cheating.
9 min readThe document is supposed to provide evidence. A connected assistant can mistakenly let it provide authority as well. Follow one fictional research task through that boundary.
9 min readContent Credentials can help establish a file's history. Three versions of an imaginary street photograph show why that history and the truth of a caption remain different questions.
9 min readGenerated training examples can improve a model or gradually narrow what it knows. The difference is in the data workflow, the checks and the evidence kept outside the loop.
9 min readA common connector can make a tool discoverable and callable. The service still has to establish whose request it is, which records are in scope and what the action is allowed to change.
9 min readA narrowly assigned model can be useful without winning every benchmark. Its deployment needs a tested stopping rule and a destination for the work it cannot reliably finish.
9 min read